TL;DR:
Check the title, date, legend and scale before you read the map.
A map shows one view, made by someone for a purpose, so ask what it leaves out.
Use a map as evidence by pairing it with written sources.
A map looks like a plain picture of facts: here is the land, here are the routes. But every map is a choice. Someone decided what to show, what to leave out and how to draw it. Reading a map as a historian means treating those choices as clues.
Start with the frame
Before reading the picture, read the edges. The title says what the map claims to show. The legend (or key) explains symbols, colours and line styles. The scale shows how distance on the map relates to distance on the ground. The date and author tell you when and by whom the map was made. If any of these are missing, say so; it limits what you can conclude.
Be especially careful with the date. A map made in the 1900s of the Roman world is a modern interpretation, not a Roman view. A map made in the period you study is a primary source. A modern map of the past is a secondary source. Both can be useful, but for different questions.
Worked example: trade routes of the Silk Road
Imagine a typical textbook map of the Silk Road: a line of dots and arrows stretching from the city of Chang'an in China, west across Central Asia through oasis cities such as Kashgar and Samarkand, and on to the Mediterranean. Walk through the checklist.
Check | What to ask | What the Silk Road map shows |
|---|---|---|
Title | What is the map about? | Trade routes between East Asia and the Mediterranean. |
Legend | What do the lines, colours and symbols mean? | Often land routes in one colour, sea routes in another, and cities as dots. |
Scale | How long are the routes? | A line may cover several thousand kilometres, a journey that took months. |
Date | When was the map made, and for which period? | Most are modern maps. The routes carried goods over many centuries, so one map often merges several periods. |
The term "Silk Road" itself was coined much later, in 1877, by the German geographer Ferdinand von Richthofen. People who traded along these routes did not use one name for them. The label is a convenient modern idea, which is itself a good point to make about maps.
What the map leaves out
Time. A single line hides the fact that routes changed with politics, climate and danger.
The network. A neat line suggests one road, when in practice there were many routes and branches.
Relay trade. Few traders travelled the whole distance. Goods usually passed through many hands, so a line from China to Rome can suggest direct contact that did not happen.
What moved. Silk was only one good. Other goods, ideas such as the spread of religions, and diseases also travelled, but a dotted line shows none of that.
People. The towns, markets and travellers are hardly visible.
These are the questions that turn a map from decoration into evidence. If you write "The map shows the Silk Road went from China to the Mediterranean," you have described it. If you write "The map shows the main routes but, because it is a modern map that merges several centuries, it cannot tell us how trade changed over time," you have analysed it.
Pair maps with other sources
A map says where. It cannot say why or how. Combine it with written sources, such as a traveller's account, a trade record or a text about a city, to find out what was traded and who was involved. Where the map and the text agree, you have corroboration. Where they differ, you have a question.
Tip: When a map is part of an exam question, annotate it: circle two features that matter and write a phrase next to each saying what they show. Then write about those two, not everything.
Maps made at the time
If your map was made in the period, it is a primary source with its own purpose. A map made for a ruler may show the territory the ruler claimed. A map made for sailors may stress coastlines and hazards. A map made for travellers may show roads and inns. The same land can look very different depending on who needed the map.
Look at what is large and what is small, what is placed at the centre, and where the empty areas are. A map that puts one city in the middle, or leaves a region blank, tells you what its maker thought mattered or did not know. Those choices are often more revealing than the geography itself.
Common mistakes
Describing the map without analysing it.
Taking a modern map as if it were made at the time.
Reading a single line as a single road.
Ignoring the scale, so that distances and travel times seem short.
Your plan for this week
Find a map from your course and fill in the four-row table. Then write two analysis sentences, one about what the map shows and one about what it hides. DuckyHelper can look at a map on your screen and talk it over with you out loud, and a good question to ask it is "what is missing from this map?"
Frequently asked questions
Is a modern map of the past useless?
No. It is a useful summary, but it is an interpretation by the person who made it, so treat it as secondary evidence.
What if there is no scale?
Say so. It limits what you can claim about distances, and you can look in another source for them.
Get started
